BANGS,
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
or NO BANGS?
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Big Decision
It's that time again...Riley's hair needs a trim. And now I'm facing, on her behalf, the question that has plagued women for decades:
BANGS,
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
BANGS,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I do like the way she looks with bangs, but they are very high maintenance, especially since her hair seems to grow so fast! She looks older with no bangs...so I guess my question to you is how often do you want to have to trim them, cuz she's cute either way :)
I think you should have her grow them out. You can easily trim them later and that way you can have her go bang-less for a while to try it out. She is super cute either way though!
Sad, baby boys just don't have these options!
I prefer with the bangs but I agree, no need to make a little girl any more high maintenece...good luck
I'm going with no bangs. I have to agree with everyone and say I like both ways, but as someone who is so annoyed with her own bangs, I say go with no bangs now for sure!
I have two girls and I'm a bit anal about hair. My vote is no bangs purely for simplicity's sake! She looks adorable either way, so fashionably it's a win/win! But I say, save yourself the trouble and go bangless for awhile!:) Like someone else mentioned, you can always cut bangs again if you decide to change your mind!
I say she looks adorable either way, but bangs are high maintenance if her hair grows fast. You always run the risk of ending up with too many as well, ask Alicia about that. Leslie
I say bangs. Just be careful since she has Ella's hairline too and before you know it, the bangs can take up her whole head...
Post a Comment